Reflection on the holy Gospel reading for the fourth Sunday after the Feast of Holy Cross
The Holy Gospel reading focuses on the parable of the rich fool. In the preceding verses (St. Luke 4-12), Jesus speaks about remaining faithful when one’s life is threatened by persecution. A man in the crowd interrupts to ask Jesus to persuade his brother to divide the family inheritance. In the response and parable that follows, Jesus speaks of danger that comes from another direction- the confidence in possessions that promise to preserve life.
Christ
refuses to settle the dispute merely at the level of property because He sees
the deeper disorder; the property has already divided the brothers. This is why
He warns- “Take
care! Be on your guard against all kinds of greed, for one’s life does not
consist in the abundance of possessions.” (v.15)
Greed is
not always obvious. It can disguise itself as fairness, ambition, or the desire
to receive what one believes is deserved. A house, inheritance, salary,
investment, field, or position may be good in itself. Yet once it becomes the
measure of our worth, the foundation of our identity, or the source of our
security, it begins to possess the possessor.
Leo
Tolstoy’s timeless classic, How Much Land Does a Man Need? is a profound
meditation on the tension between need and greed. The story follows Pakhom, a
contented peasant whose desire for more land gradually becomes an obsession. He
encounters the chief of a tribe who offers to sell him as much land as he can
encircle on foot in a day, provided he returns to his starting point by sunset.
Pakhom pushes himself beyond his limits and as the day wanes, he realizes he
has ventured too far. He races desperately to reach the starting point in time.
He collapses and dies from exhaustion, and his servant buries him in a grave in
the very land he had sought so feverishly to acquire. The answer to the titular
question is that, in the end, a man needs only enough land to bury him.
The
Parable of the Rich Fool (St.Luke 12:13-21) tells of a wealthy landowner whose
fields produce an abundant harvest. Believing his prosperity guarantees
security, he plans to tear down his barns and build larger ones to store his
grain and enjoy many years of comfort. Yet God declares him a fool, for that
very night his life is required of him, and all he has accumulated is left
behind.
It is the ground
which he owns but cannot command bore the abundance. The rich man, who uses
"I" and "my" over and over, did not generate anything. The
parable does not mention any exploited labourers or any fraud, so the Scripture
lets us assume the rich man has got the wealth through honest means. And this
is where it should perturb us. The parable indicts the person whose wealth is
clean, but whose life is still wrong.
The Day That Cannot Be Stored
The first Old
Testament reading from Numbers 29:35-30:1 describes Israel’s observance of the
feast of the tabernacles. On the eighth day, the people are summoned to a
sacred assembly. Ordinary labour ceases, offerings are presented, and Israel’s
time is reordered around the worship of God.
At first
sight, this ceremonial passage may seem far removed from the parable however, it
confronts the very illusion at the heart of the rich man’s plans; the belief
that the future belongs to him. The rich farmer has counted his harvest and calculated
his storage. But while grain can be stored, years cannot. Tomorrow cannot be
locked inside a barn.
“On the eighth day
you shall have a sacred assembly.” (v.35), The eighth day carries a profound Christian
resonance. Christ rose on the first day of the week, which the Church also
understands as the eighth day, the beginning of a life beyond the circle of
mortality. The farmer’s imagination remains imprisoned within the repetitive
cycle of earthly existence; sowing, harvesting, storing, consuming, and
enlarging.
Israel’s
sacred calendar taught the people that time was not an uninterrupted field for
human productivity. Certain days were to be returned visibly to God. Labour
ceased because economic activity did not have the final claim upon human life.
Time belonged to the Lord before it belonged to the farmer, merchant, king, or
the labourer.
Solomon’s
Temple and the Farmer’s Barns
In the
second Old Testament reading (1 Kings 8:27-30), Solomon stands before the newly
completed Temple and confesses: “Even heaven and the highest
heaven cannot contain you, much less this house that I have built!” (v.27). Solomon
builds a magnificent Temple and immediately acknowledges that God cannot be
contained within it. The farmer builds great barns and imagines that his life
can be contained within them.
This
contrast reveals two radically different uses of human structures. The Temple,
for all its grandeur, remains open towards heaven. The farmer’s barns are
closed in upon themselves. They gather everything towards the man and return
nothing to God or neighbour. The rich farmer is not judged because he owns
barns but because his barns have become his temple and his possessions have
become his promised salvation.
With
Great Compassion I Will Gather You
The
third Old Testament reading Isaiah 54:5-8 reveals the true foundation of
security. The prophet addresses Zion in a condition of grief, shame, and
apparent abandonment. Yet the Lord promises that abandonment will not have the
final word: “For a brief moment I abandoned you, but with great compassion I
will gather you.” (v.7)
These
words address one of the deepest human fears which is the fear of being forgotten
or left without a future. The rich man attempts to answer this fear by
accumulation. Isaiah offers a radically different answer. God’s people are
secure not because they have accumulated enough, but because the Creator has
bound Himself to them in covenant love.
Earlier
in Isaiah 54, Zion is commanded to enlarge the place of her tent, lengthen her
cords, and strengthen her stakes. But this enlargement does not arise from
anxious accumulation but from the promise of divine restoration. There is an
enlargement that makes the heart smaller, and there is an enlargement that
makes the heart more like God. Genesis 41 also features a man who built great
storehouses. But Joseph's barns were built on behalf of a famine-stricken
world, and when hunger came, he opened them to Egypt and to his own starving
brothers.
The
Gospel does not teach to live without prudent provision. However, a barn
becomes spiritually dangerous when it possesses only an entrance and no exit,
when blessings are gathered in but never allowed to flow out.
Today
the barns are rarely made of wood and stone. In an age when affluence makes it
easier than ever to arrange a life without dependence on neighbours, with
delivery for what we need, screens for what we want, and gated spaces for what
we fear, the parable reveals the gravest form of poverty. It is not to have too
little, but to be blind to the fact that a full barn is a poor substitute for a
rich soul.
The
parable ends with a haunting question- “The things you have prepared, whose
will they be?” (v.20). The answer is deliberately left to the hearer. Christ
concludes the parable by warning against storing up treasures for oneself while
failing to be “rich toward God.” To be rich toward God is not to give God
something He lacks, but to recognize that abundance is entrusted to us, not for
private sovereignty, but for faithful stewardship.
The man
in the crowd had asked Jesus to divide an inheritance, but Jesus pointed him to
a greater inheritance. The real inheritance was never the land, the grain, the
barn or the house. It is the treasures
that endure-eyes to discern the generosity of God, hearts that recognize the
responsibility accompanying wealth, the wisdom to remember life's fragility,
and the humility to hear the call to repentance hidden within abundance.
Therefore,
with the Psalmist, let us pray: “Teach us to number our days, that we may
gain a heart of wisdom” (Psalm 90:12), so that when our stewardship ends,
we may be found not rich in possessions, but rich toward God.
In Christ,
Rincy
“Are you not a robber? The things you received in trust as a stewardship, have you not appropriated them for yourself? Is not the person who strips another of clothing called a thief? And those who do not clothe the naked when they have the power to do so, should they not be called the same?
The bread which you are holding back is for the hungry; the clothes you keep put away are for the naked, the shoes that are rotting away with disuse are for those who have none, the silver you keep buried in the earth belongs is for the needy. You are thus guilty of injustice towards as many as you might have aided and did not.”- St. Basil (On Social Justice)
No comments:
Post a Comment